Learning Style(z)
Matt* and Christine gave an abridged version of their learning styles presentation to the rest of the tutoring staff last night, and there was a lot of discussion about learning styles and how they might impact tutoring.
I had some downtime during a shift and skimmed a few journal articles that cited Gregorc and his measure (the same one that Matt and Christine used in their research). Zollinger and Martinson (2010) studied undergrads majoring in design to see if they had a learning style preference. Their implications for design teachers might apply to tutors, too:
“Knowledge of learning styles is an important for design educators. Because learning style affects the learning success of students in specific kinds of situations, instructors need to be sensitive to learning style differences. Workshops on recognizing student learning styles should be offered to instructors where they can gain knowledge about learning styles by having their own learning style assessed. Because as Dunn and Dunn (1979) suggested, instructors tend to teach the way they learn, special attention should be given as to how their learning style may affect their teaching and the students’ learning.” (p. 12)
Tom and Christine asked us what we thought about tutors recognizing their own styles and trying to adapt to writers. I think that Zollinger and Martinson warn against teachers teaching to their own style, as if they thought the class was made up of their own clones. Tutors might want to recognize that what works for them might not work well for others.
As for adaptability, tutors might consider switching their delivery or technique if it isn’t landing with the writer. Maybe that writer needs to diagram and make webs, but that one needs to talk through it, while that other one needs to do some reflective writing - all in order to make the same point.
Here is their breakdown of styles from Zollinger and Martinson:
Concrete sequential:
-
Derive information through direct, hands-on experience -“seeing is believing”
-
Appreciate order & logical sequence
-
Prefer touchable, concrete materials
-
Ordered, step- by-step presentations help
-
Workbooks, computer-assisted instruction, & assembly kits are appropriate
Concrete random:
-
Experimental attitudes
-
Seeing what “makes things tick”
-
Trial-and-error and risk-taking approaches while exploring unstructured problemsolving situations
-
Need guidance but not domination
-
They like games, simulations, independent study projects, brainstorming, and optional reading assignments
Abstract sequential:
-
excellent decoding abilities with written, verbal, & imagery symbols
-
Like to use reading, listening, & visual skills
-
Like sequential and logical presentations such as slides & lectures
-
Appreciate extensive reading assignments, lectures, & analytical “thinking sessions”
-
Excel in organizing & analyzing research and debating ideas
Abstract random:
-
Emotional and imaginative
-
Learn holistically & prefer unstructured learning experiences (e.g., group discussions & webbing)
-
Like a busy environment and prefer freedom from rules and guidelines
-
This type of learner organizes material through reflection
*In the earlier version of this, I mixed Tom and Vishal’s discussion with Matt and Christine’s and kept referring to “Tom and Christine’s discussion”. I hope, in time, that I can earn forgiveness.


